The huge-paying Goldman Sachs job that wasn’t

It’s a roller coaster ride that few of us will ever experience; in the morning everyone’s saying that you’re about to get a banking job with huge bonus potential, then in the afternoon the story’s been updated to “clarify” that you aren’t.  If Prince Harry and Meghan Markle ever bump into Andrea Orcel at a charity event, they might find they’ve got a lot to talk about.

It seems that what actually happened is that the couple had been speaking about making an appearance in the Talks At GS series, a sort of even more exclusive TED Talk program that’s featured David Beckham, Malcolm Gladwell, Deepak Chopra and pretty much everyone else who’s been on a magazine cover (except Bernie Sanders, and he’s probably not booked for the coming season either).  Someone seems to have clarified pretty quickly that the Talks series isn’t a paying gig, and that any money mentioned would be going to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s charities in any case. (For American readers, and indeed for British ones who don’t keep up with these things, that’s Harry and Meghan, using one of their other titles).

That might have been someone at Kensington Palace, or it might have been someone at Goldman Sachs – although the scandals of the 2010s are largely in the past, the word “princeling” still sets off alarm bells in the human resources departments of big investment banks, who remember the swingeing fines levied by the US authorities for employing sons and daughters of politically connected Asian officials.  Although Harry would be a useful addition to the pitch meeting if his father ever decides to sell Cornwall to a private equity firm, the compliance overhead in the meantime is probably not worth the trouble.

In many ways this might be considered a shame; if the world had turned out differently, the Earl of Dumbarton (another name for Harry) could have done surprisingly well at getting through the notoriously endless interview process.  Goldman has a Veterans Integration Process specially designed to provide internships for former Army officers, after all.  He might even have got multiple offers – JP Morgan also has a veterans program, and they are alleged to have paid $1m either to the couple or their charities for an appearance at their Miami Alternative Investment Summit.

The amounts of money talked about are all highly speculative – and the PR expert quoted as estimating the royal couple’s earning power at $1bn must have a distinctly pre-crash understanding of the size of investment banking promotional budgets – but it’s noticeable that Baron Kilkeel (also Harry) would not be acting without precedent if he decided to cash in.  His uncle, Prince Edward appeared with a kilt-wearing piper to present a lecture series for Northern Trust Wealth Management in 1999, although he only got £200,000 (equivalent of $450k in 2019 US dollars) for three appearances.  This might reflect the fact that Edward was only an Earl (of Wessex) while Harry’s highest title is a Duke.  For American readers the difference between the two is roughly equivalent to the step up from Executive Director to Managing Director, and this might start to matter soon.  As part of their “step back” from the Royal Family, Harry and Meghan have agreed to stop using their royal titles, so he will need some new ones, and if he does start to work at Goldman Sachs, he’s likely to want something a bit better than “Vice President and EMEA Regional Co-Head”.

Daniel Davies –


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *